Let's get this over with
Immeasurable Speed Removal
Well, the justification for the Immeasurable speed is just wrong.
First of all, the WoG are clearly contradicted in the main series since the series best speed feats are only MFTL+, there's not much evidence to show that the WoG is correct because there's not much evidence in game
"Magolor was in a dimension beyond space-time so he is immeasurable"
Quoting Vs Battles about it:
>"Contrary to popular belief, Magolor was never sent into a "dimension beyond space and time" after his defeat in Return to Dream Land, said description refers to the same dimension where his fight took place, Another Dimension."
Now, the Another Dimension beyond space-time statement could be true, however, it would not grant the characters immeasurable speed as it could just mean the structure, not the actual time and the dimension would be just Low 2-C. and there's need actual in-game evidence that it's actually a dimension beyond space-time. these just apply for composite
"Galacta Knight came from a dimension beyond space-time"
That's blatanly wrong, that was just a portal that Star Dream used to summon him
"extra-dimensional" simply means that it had acess to various dimensions and "beyond space-time" could simply mean that it open holes (portals) in space-time. and once again, there's need to be actual evidence that he actually transcended space-time. and it means that it's "beyond space-time continuum" meaning it's outside of space-time normally. so again no, that's not a immeasurable speed feat.
And as such, the Immeasurable speed rating should go
Void Termina's omnipresent removal
Another no, that statement just means that there's a different void in each dimension. A.K.A not the same void
Non-Composite 2-C Removal
Probably the biggest downgrade here, first of all: the "bla bla universe" statements
Drawcia never turned the universe into a painting, she turned large areas of space and Dreamland into a painting. and if she was going to do it, it would be probably mean over time.
"bringing darkness over the universe" is not enough to be 3-A, it would just mean that 0 and 02 would take over the universe with their darkness, Universe conquering =/= tiering applicable to that tier
having a attack called "Big Bang" doens't mean that it's just as powerful as a real big bang. according to this logic, Vegeta (DBZ) is Low 2-C because his attack is called "Big Bang Attack", when he is just 4-B at best.
The Another Dimension collapse feat is a chain reaction (Magolor was using the full power of the Master Crown > Kirby defeated Magolor which then returned to his base form > Kirby destroyed the master crown > the effects of it was the master crown's power was starting to collapse the another dimension; only the master crown scales to it, no one else.) even if Kirby scales to that, it would be just 4-A because the Master Crown didn't destroyed all of another dimension as the said dimension is in Star Allies, what it only destroyed was the Interstellar arena of the Sphere Doomers, which is only 4-A
"destroy all organic life in the universe" doens't make you universal.
Void Termina "destroy everything" statements are too vague, they are too poetic and could easily mean that he's really strong, not that he actually have 2-C power. for example "this man have the power to shake the entire earth and the universe as we know thanks to it's magnificient power" when the man has only 6-A feats, so it's a hyperbole. if we take these hyperbolic poetic statements seriously, Kakashi is omnipotent then.
So what his tier should be? 4-A
Now, this is Post-Canvas Course, because the 4-A feats became consistent after Canvas Course Happened. before that, Kirby should be at least 5-A to 4-B via his multiple 5-A feats and scaling to Dark Nebula's Supermassive black hole he created during his transformation, which should have at least this levels of power.
Now plot twist!: 2-C shouldn't be removed, it should have a key for it's own which would be composite game Kirby or would be the post-canvas course or Post-Star Allies key with "4-A, possibly 2-C" which i'm neutral with.
And, that's it.