Yes, the changes can be applied.
>Normally, yeah, but they also "disappear from the story" itself.
That doesnt help.
>And than promised land people that see even that as literal dream, story, and unreality -> They exist in a state beyond even that and disappeared from The World itself -> A fourth state
Seeing a Type 2 nondual structure as fiction doesnt grant you Type 3 nonduality. It has no relation with an extra truth value.
>True Dragons and Chaos Spirits are beings that exist at both sides of this duality, being 0 and 1 at the same time, contradicting attributes, and thus would apply to Dialetheic System of Logic, and be Type 2 Nonduality
You first need proof that Light and Darkness encompasses the whole verse to be considered Type 2.
Either way, I really dont see how dialetheism is equivalent to Type 2 nonduality, I should probably revise it.
>Now, Promised Land people are those that have disappeared from the World, literally, and see everything as a Dream, and see Rimuru as a dream as well, Rimuru whereas is a True Dragon, a Chaos Spirit. Due to this, its assumed that "World" would include True Dragons, as Promised Land people see both as a dream and story, unreality.
Thus, this would be another possible state of being that is neither of the previous, and be Transduality Type 3 [possessing 4 states, or being none of the 3 states]
Same as my first point.
>For conceptual god, he exists in a state that is All-in-one yet also one-in-all to the previously mentioned, all of it being merely its consciousness
Same as above.
>Time Stop (Range : High 1-B+)
We dont add range like that to a power in the P&A.
Causality Manipulation (High 1-B+
Same here.
>Nonexistent Physiology (Higher Degree/Layer into Type 3)
There is no reason for this to be "higher degree" since it's on his first key.
>Nonduality (Type 3) and Acausality (Type 5) (For his Ascendant Self; Those that have ascended to the Promised Land have abandoned their Souls, the Source of Collective Consciousness, their Mind and thoughts, their fundamental Information in Reality, and the Conceptual Self that True Dragons, they are released from the Story and unbound by all restrictions on any and all levels such as Laws, Fate and Events[Plot], Laws also also include the Law of Causality, they disappear from the World itself, in a sense that their Fictional Body exists, yet their True Body doesn't, as the Story of the World itself has become a dream to them; Those who have ascended have disappeared from the World and its state of beings, such as Existence, Conventional Nonexistence of the Forbidden Void, and the Absolute Nothingness of the Sub-Space, as well as all other states of being; existed before the World itself and was the one who created the World's Laws, including the Law of Cause and Effect, even that which binds Ultimate Level beings themselves, he was the one who introduced the cycle of Cause and Effect to the World to begin with)
The reasoning used does not justify Nonduality Type 3, only NEP3 if anything. It does not mention all dualities, only a few.
>Abstract Existence, Beyond Dimensional Existence, Nonexistent Physiology (Even Higher Degree of Type 3), Transduality (Higher Degree of Type 3), Acausality (Type 5) and Avatar Creation (Concept Type 1;
The reasoning used does not justify Concept Type 1 nor Nonduality Type 3. This is only Concept Manip Type 3 and further NEP if anything.
>Immunity Negation (The World itself goes according to its Will; Even the Star King Veldanava, from when he was born and the point where he fell in love and than died, everything was its Will)
Why is this immunity negation?
>"Possibly Low 1-C" comes from the possibility that Toad's mentioning of The Power Stars having the power to encompass "all reality" extends to the entire multiverse, which if that interpretation is taken, would fall under Low 1-C via this wiki's standards
Is the reason for Low 1-C here being the power stars containing a 2-A multiverse? If so, it's still not quite Low 1-C, but just 2-A.
>; they are capable of going to and retaining their form at the End of Space-Time, where the World has ended,
Being able to reach aspatial/atemporal places doesnt mean you have the nature of that place.
You need a statement that says such incompleteness is in relation to the completeness of their true form.
>their true form cannot be perceived by the humans or non-spiritual existences
This is not really relevant, since the spiritual world is obviously another world separate from the physical world, just like any other random dimension that cant be normally perceived with human eyes. You'd need statements that they cant be perceived due to the spirit world being beyond the physical world, because thats what differentiates platonic realms from any random/conventional unseen dimension/world. And going by what that scan is saying, it just looks like a case of human eyes not being able to see invisible things.
>they can also manifest constructs like the Cardinal World, Higher Dimensional Constructs
This doesnt seem relevant.
"Super-higher-dimensional" is a made-up word. So unless the verse has info on what this word actually means, then I'll just assume it means "a strong higher-dimensional being", which isnt inherently Tier 1 and still aligns with the tier Arata currently has.
Im not sure how this is supposed to be Tier 1.
The problem isnt only that, it's the fact that the WoG is unverifiable or unlinkable. There is no link that can show said WoG actually exists, as opposed to it being just a fake scan someone made. This is the reason why supposed PMs cant be used as evidence, because there is no link to them that can prove they are real.
Also, this is the wrong thread to ask this.
The OP makes sense to me.
>That would make even more sense, yes, because if they used "axis" for "World[s]", it would quite directly clarify that all the worlds all-together had the same time axis.
I dont see how. You could perfectly use both singular and plural form of axis there and the context still wouldn't inherently invalidate my point.
>Not really, if you read the next time after it, the highlighted topic wasn't that the time axes were different or not, but that if they were "synchronized or not", and the follow up line was "than there would be no time difference even in the dimensional leap"
Im not sure what this is supposed to mean.
>But from my pov the wording is more indicating something like this:
"The synchronization between timelines is a phenomenon that could not be expected in reality", which is backed up by these scan that the focus was on the synchronized or not time axes part
We are going nowhere with this, so I'll just agree to disagree. If other staff think my interpretation is wrong then it is what it is.
>Because from here
you leap from one timeline to another, its impossible for the time to be the same, but if you travel in time in the same timeline, that
A different flow/moment/progression of time isnt really the same of a different axis.
Parallel worlds[timelines] do not overlap.
From the context of the scan, its talking about duplicates of the same existence, not time axes.
You can intentionally synchronize the timelines between worlds, meaning naturally they are not synced, and one needs to do it manually.
If this is about the first scan, then like I said, the sync here is really just about sync-ing the period of time one would go after time travelling, which isnt really related to time axes but rather the different progression of events from two distinct timelines.
With that being said, even with my disagreements I still think its Tier 1.
Here is my take on it:
Cycles within Worlds = 2-A
Worlds = Low 1-C
Dimensions = Varies from Low 1-C to [Whatever number of dimensions there are, the blog doesnt say]
Labyrinth = Arbitrarily high into 1-B
Cardinal World = High 1-B
>The second one is "If the time axes of the worlds are synchronized--- such a phenomenon could not be expected"
First off, axes is used, its plural of "Axis"
[the comparison is between the time axis of one world and that of another, and as a result the word "axes" is used rather than axis--- if it was just one time axis, than they would have used something like "synchronization between the flow of time" instead, rather than using the term Axes]
Or it's being used in plural because it's talking about worlds (plural), which would also take less assumptions.
>As said before, first it goes to clear the dimension part, but than also says the world's time axes are also unsynchronized, meaning there is no synchronization and the time ax[es] are different. That's why in reality synchronization is not possible by natural means.
Like I said, the comparison would not make sense if it was talking about worlds being unsynchronized. The line "If the time axes of the worlds are synchronized--- such a phenomenon could not be expected" is a reference to the dimensions having their own time axes, specifically the "such a phenomenon could not be expected" part, because it previously spoke about the axes of dimensions being unique to each other in context.
It thus follows that what the paragraph is trying to say is essentially: "Since the time axes of worlds are synchronized, there would be no difference even if the dimension leaps. But since the time axes of each dimension is different than the other, such a phenomenon (that one would expect from worlds being synchronized) could not be expected after travelling to a different dimension."
>However, about the first part, because Rimuru was killed in another "Cycle", and that cycle was called "another time axis"[of the cycle where he was killed]. I don't see why this doesn't mean they don't have different time axes.
Because merely being a "different time axis" doesnt mean that the axis is unique to itself in relation to the other timelines. You can have multiple different timelines that each share the same direction (because what would make them different are its events, not its specific direction inherently), which is the default assumption.
Why is this scan being used to claim Worlds have their own time axis when it's talking about Dimensions? And if it's supposed to be for Dimensions, then why is it being used for Worlds? Besides, from the way it is worded, it seems to say that the time axis of Worlds are the same, and the reason why "this phenomenon could not be expected", is exactly because the time axis of Dimensions are the ones that are different from each other, as opposed from the ones from Worlds (which would be the same). Otherwise that comparison wouldn't make sense.
This scan seems to be only referring to the difference between two cycles, instead of saying that the time axis of all cycles are different. As for the paradox thing, the timeline not allowing contradictions is not really an indication of a unique time axis. It just means the timelines themselves have a mechanism that sends the overlapping intruder to a different timeline in which the intruder is yet to exist, to avoid any paradoxes. The timelines themselves can still have the same time axis under those rules.
He said 5 agreements, not 5 mods.
Looks ok.
What is the reason for those resistances?
I unlocked the pages. The accepted changes can be applied.
>Just curious, why is the Universe 2-A - is that for the Metaverse stuff, or are you taking into account what Rama said to Deadman?
Thinking about it, Im not actually sure if it would be 2-A, 1-B, or High 1-B, since universes are said to be "omnijective" in the same way a Reality is.
From what Im seeing:
Universe: 2-A
Reality: High 1-B
Hierarchy of realities within realities: High 1-B+
The Parliament: 1-A
Sphere of Gods: 1-A
Collective Unconscious: 1-A
The Source: 1-A
As for abilities:
>Nonexistent Physiology (Type 2; Nekron has no soul[20])
Why is a lack of soul being used for NEP? I feel like there is context missing here
>Nonduality (Type 3 - Scaling to Source, who is beyond all dualities)
The justification should be changed into something like "Exists as the opposite of the Source itself, which is beyond all dualities"
Rest looks fine.
Just because he encompasses a Type 2 nondual structure without being the structure himself is not a ground for Type 3. For that to be the case, you'd need a statement with nonduality as the context (Anos's source got Type 3 for this reason, as its directly stated to be the opposite of all order). Otherwise anyone who transcends a type 2 ND character would be Type 3. Its the same with characters that dont get Type 5 acausality just for seeing Type 4 acausals as fiction. In cases like this you need direct statements instead of relying on technicalities.